CPR Part 32 statements, structured breach and causation analysis, and an automated Medical Pagination service that turns hundreds of unsorted pages into a paginated, indexed, chronological bundle with a clinical chronology and radiology schedule.
Clinical negligence software turns a disorganised medical file into usable evidence: a paginated and indexed bundle, a clinical chronology, a lay witness statement in the client's own voice, and the Pre-Action Protocol Letter of Claim assembled from it.
Most clinical negligence claims settle before issue, so there is often no Particulars of Claim and no Defence. The workflow therefore runs off the chronology, the witness statement and the Pre-Action Protocol rather than off pleadings, and it keeps expert reports out of the disclosable medical-records bundle.
This module covers claimant clinical negligence work in the United Kingdom, grounded in Bolam, Bolitho and Montgomery, with breach, causation and consent kept as separate and correctly labelled issues.
Upload hundreds of unsorted GP notes, hospital records and imaging reports. Expert reports, drafts and correspondence stay outside the disclosable medical-records bundle. We OCR every page, deduplicate, section by record-type and produce a single searchable PDF with a clickable index, a clinical chronology and a radiology schedule. The bundle the expert wants, the chronology the fee earner needs, in one pass. £150 per bundle.
Drag and drop the full medical disclosure exactly as you received it. No pre-sorting, no naming conventions, no manual scanning required.
Every page is OCR’d, scanned for duplicates and sectioned by record-type. Out the other side: a single searchable PDF with a clickable index.
A structured clinical chronology and a separate radiology schedule are produced alongside the paginated bundle - the documents the expert wants on day one.
The bundle sits in your account just long enough to be downloaded, then it is purged. The platform is not a long-term store of your medical records.
Once the bundle is paginated, upload the chronology, the claimant interview or attendance note, relevant medical records and pre-action correspondence into the Witness Statement Generator. Pleadings can be added if the case has reached that stage, but they are not required. The system assembles a first-person CPR Part 32-format claimant statement that lines up the lay account with the paginated bundle references. Expert opinion stays with the expert; the claimant statement is a lay narrative for your fee-earner to verify with the claimant before sign-off.
Upload the typed attendance note or recorded call with your claimant and the AI extracts the chronology of treatment, the alleged breach and the impact on the claimant’s life.
Add the paginated bundle, chronology, claimant interview or attendance note and pre-action correspondence. Pleadings are optional where available. The statement cross-refers to the paginated bundle so each source page can be found quickly.
15 automated format checks cover statement of truth, declarations, preparation-method disclosure, source attribution for every fact and the CJC-aligned AI-use declaration block — aligned to clin neg lay narrative discipline (expert opinion stays with the expert). Substance is verified by your fee-earner with the claimant.
Citations drawn from a curated library of UK clinical negligence authorities, grounded in Bolam, Bolitho and Montgomery, and extending to Chester v Afshar, Bailey v MoD, Khan v Meadows and McCulloch. No fabricated cases.
Bolam/Bolitho-grounded analysis of the standard of care, with the questions the expert will be asked.
Material contribution (Bailey v MoD), loss of chance (Gregg v Scott), and the modern but-for/causation cases.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire and the duty to warn of material risks - pleading, evidence and statement framing.
In clinical negligence the witness statement is drafted early, before the expert is instructed, and it is revised repeatedly. Our witness statement drafting software keeps the lay narrative factual and the format compliant, and it will not import case law or opinion into a statement that should carry neither.
CPR Part 32 lay statements built from the claimant interview, medical records, chronology and pre-action correspondence. Pleadings are optional where available.
OCR + AI sectioning + duplicate removal. Output: single searchable PDF, clickable index, clinical chronology, radiology schedule, expert memo.
a curated library of UK clinical negligence authorities, grounded in Bolam, Bolitho and Montgomery, and extending to Chester, Whitehouse, Wilsher, Gregg, Bailey, FB v Princess Alexandra, Khan v Meadows and McCulloch.
A sample of the precedents the AI cites in this area. Every citation is cross-checked against the database before it reaches you.
Bolam v Friern HMC [1957] 1 WLR 582
Standard of care: the responsible body of medical opinion test.
Bolitho v City and Hackney HA [1998] AC 232
The Bolam test subject to logical analysis by the court.
Montgomery v Lanarkshire HB [2015] UKSC 11
Informed consent and the duty to warn of material risks.
Bailey v MoD [2008] EWCA Civ 883
Material contribution to indivisible injury where but-for fails.
Chester v Afshar [2004] UKHL 41
Causation and the duty to warn in surgical consent.
Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21
Scope of duty and the SAAMCO principle in clinical negligence.
Book a 20-minute walkthrough with our team and see the workflow on a live file.